Saturday 12 November 2016

President Buhari commends Akwa Ibom State government for hosting Super Eagles vs Algeria Match

President Buhari commends Akwa Ibom State government for hosting Super Eagles vs Algeria Match
President Muhammadu Buhari has congratulated the Super Eagles on their outstanding 3-1 victory over Algeria in the African qualifiers for the 2018 World Cup in Russia.
President Buhari joins millions of football loving fans in the country in celebrating the very-much improved national team for meeting our expectations during the entertaining and action-soaked encounter.
The President commends the team and its handlers for displaying uncommon strength, determination and high professionalism in the onward and steady progress to the 2018 tournament in Russia.
With six points in our kitty from two impressive wins, President Buhari assures the team that the Federal Government; and indeed all Nigerians will continue to support them to make the nation proud.
The President also commends the Akwa-Ibom State government for hosting the match and the fans for their good conduct and sportsmanship throughout the game.
Femi Adesina
Special Adviser to the President
(Media & Publicity)
November 12, 2016

Buhari Congratulates Super Eagles for Defeating Algeria


President Muhammadu Buhari congratulates the Super Eagles on their outstanding 3-1 victory over Algeria in the African qualifiers for the 2018 World Cup in Russia.
President Buhari joins millions of football loving fans in the country in celebrating the very-much improved national team for meeting our expectations during the entertaining and action-soaked encounter.
The President commends the team and its handlers for displaying uncommon strength, determination and high professionalism in the onward and steady progress to the 2018 tournament in Russia.
With six points in our kitty from two impressive wins, President Buhari assures the team that the Federal Government; and indeed all Nigerians will continue to support them to make the nation proud.
The President also commends the Akwa-Ibom State government for hosting the match and the fans for their good conduct and sportsmanship throughout the game.

Victor Moses Scores Twice to Frustrate Algeria

Victor Moses scored a brace, a goal in each half, to propel the Super Eagles to victory against visiting Desert Foxes


Victor Moses scored twice while Chelsea teammate John Obi Mikel was also on target as Nigeria downed Algeria 3-1 to stay on course for the World Cup finals on Saturday.
Nigeria have a perfect six points from two games in Group B, four ahead of Cameroon who drew 1-1 at home to Zambia.
The Nigerians took the game to their opponents and were rewarded after 25 minutes when Moses was released by Mikel to fire past Algeria goalkeeper Rais M'Bolhi.
The Super Eagles doubled their lead three minutes from the interval when Mikel controlled the ball at the top of the box and after a moment of hesitation, drilled it beyond the Algerian keeper.
Algeria pulled a goal back in the 67th minute, when Nabil Bentaleb smashed home an unstoppable shot from distance.
Man of the match Moses then put the game beyond the north Africans in stoppage time, when he smashed home off a low cross by substitute Ahmed Musa.
The outcome could have been a lot different had the visitors made the most of two clear-cut chances in the first half.
First, Schalke 04 star Bentaleb missed a sitter from inside the Nigeria box after 36 minutes.
And minutes later, Riyad Mahrez came close to getting on the score sheet, but his shot just missed the target with the Nigeria defence at his mercy.
When Algeria pulled a goal back, they pegged their hosts in their own half with the dangerous Yacine Brahimi tormenting the Eagles defence and Mahrez in charge of the midfield.
Nigeria goalkeeper Daniel Akpeyi, in for the injured Carl Ikeme, tipped away a free kick with nine minutes left on the clock.

Ooops: TB Joshua Delete Post Predicting "Win" for Hillary Clinton

Image result for tb joshua 
This is really funny, our men of God wouldn't stop to amaze us. Since they stopped minding the business of the alter and decided politics is more interesting, some of them have gone from one public embarrassment to another. Popular Synagogue church of All Nations, SCOAN preacher TB Joshua who predicted a win for American Democratic candidate, Hillary Clinton; has deleted his earlier post claiming he saw a woman win the US elections win a slim margin.

A  visit to his page this morning, shows the prophet which many have now called out on social media for being fake, took off the post this early morning after it was clear Donald Trump had won the US elections.

A link to his earlier post below, shows the post no longer exist on his wall
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1263560413764732&id=103470916440360


Meanwhile see earlier post here. T.B Joshua Predicts Winner of US Presidential Elections 

Now American politics aside, if the man was your pastor, would you still trust him? 


A Second Look at America's New First Lady, What kind of first lady will Melania Trump be? [photos]


While the world is still in shock over the historic victory of America's new president elect Donald Trump, the  2016 U.S presidential election has recorded yet another first-ever landmarks, the next first lady of United States, Melania Trump.

So Americans took to the streets last night to protest the victory of the new president, chanting protest songs "You are not our president" in total rejection of a man many Americans say he is not fit to be called their president. But the bigger joke Americans are yet to come to term with is the image of their new first lady.
According to first-lady historians,  Jean Wahl Harris, who studies the role of the first lady at the University of Scranton says she see Melania coping beautifully with her new role.

"In terms of the evolution of the first lady, I see (Trump) moving us back to the more traditional role,"  "A very traditional social hostess is something I think she will be comfortable with."

But she will be expected to be front and center, not shy and retiring like Bess Truman in the 1940s. But Trump was hardly on the campaign trail so what's to stop her from doing the unexpected as first lady?

"Starting with Kennedy, the expectations have ratcheted up, it's not just about being a good wife and mother," Harris says. "Americans expect (the first lady) to be a celebrity, to be seen, to support your husband, to have a project that's good for the nation. And we expect to see you."

She "will surely rise to the rather rigid strictures of a job whose very existence is something of an anachronism," adds Elizabeth Mehren, professor of journalism and expert on first ladies at Boston University. "Mrs. Trump has signaled that her 'cause' may be cyberbullying, a safe bet for the mother of a 10-year-old, but less safe for the wife of someone who sends mean tweets at 3 in the morning."

  Here are a Few tips that makes Melania Trump historic?

First foreign-born FLOTUS in 191 years: Born in Slovenia in Eastern Europe in 1970, Trump will be the first first lady not born in the USA since Louisa Adams, wife of President John Quincy Adams, who was born in England in 1775, when America was still an English colony, and took office in 1825.

First Wife No. 3: Past presidents have had multiple wives (Reagan, Ford, Wilson and Theodore Roosevelt among them), but no one else before President-elect Trump has been married and divorced twice before marrying a third time.

First former fashion model:
Trump made her living as fashion model Melania Knauss before and after she came to the U.S., and met Trump at a fashion party. They married in 2005, and have one son, Barron.
 
First to have posed nude: She took it all off for photographers at least twice: The New York Post ran one set of images in July of Trump in her birthday suit in 1995 when she was 25. British GQ ran its own set of images, from 2000, in March, and again online on Tuesday, of Trump sprawled on a fur throw, wearing nothing but jeweled bracelets and a handcuff.

First for whom English is not her first language: Her native language is Slovenian but she also speaks four others: English, French, Serbian and German. This fluency could come in handy, as it did for President Kennedy, whose wife spoke French and Spanish.

"I see her going back to a Jackie Kennedy model of first lady," says Harris. "She's not going to want to be in the public eye. Jackie Kennedy wanted to protect her children and herself. Melania will be like that, she won't like talking in public."

Douglas Brinkley, a presidential historian at Rice University, also sees her in the "mold" of Jackie Kennedy. "Somebody who has keen eye on fashion, who doesn’t interfere with policy-making in a public way. She will travel and be courted around Europe as someone who is glamorous. ... There's no advantage for her to get involved in politics in a visceral way."

As a former fashion model, she can help boost the fortunes of the American fashion industry, the way Mrs. Obama did almost every time she appeared in public. Trump also will be expected to fill the "oldest job" of the first lady role, says Lisa Kathleen Graddy, curator at a first ladies exhibit at the Smithsonian's National Museum of American History.
Donald Trump and his wife, Melania, are seen after

"The through-line between Martha Washington and Michelle Obama is the role of administration hostess, the public face of the administration," Graddy says.

But since Trump himself was a mold-breaker, so might be Melania, says Mark Feldstein, a professor of journalism at the University of Maryland. "I think all bets are off as far as usual expectations, and that applies to the first lady as well as Trump himself."

Melania can help soften Trump's tempestuous image, Brinkley said. "She is going to be seen as the temperancefigure, keeping his temper down to earth," he said. "She'll do fine, she's not likely going to be a pioneering first lady. But being a mom is a big deal and raising her son is going to be all-consuming."

And she probably can count on Americans to help her, even those who didn't vote for Trump, says veteran Hollywood insider Howard Bragman, founder of Fifteen Minutes Public Relations.

"I think people are going to want to give her a chance," he said. "She knows exactly who her husband is and what he is, she'll be a good ear for him, a kinder, gentler one, I would hope. I think people will be more judgmental about him, and they will give her a chance."
Culled from US Today

Impact of Foreign Aid on Economic Growth in Africa

Impact of Foreign Aid on Economic Growth in Africa
  • Foreign aid is a modern joystick used to play a modern game called the African economy!
  • Have African economies been hijacked?
    It is an undeniable fact that foreign aid has extensively, intensively and forwardly steered the economies in Africa’s countries. This can be seen from the rise in the numbers of school going children, the current ease in the accessibility of health services, the current efficiency of armies and the sister security organs, the increase in infrastructure such as stadiums, roads, universities and bridges. The impact goes on and on. More still, a remarkable paradigm shift has occurred in the respective GDPs of the countries that receive aid. To get a vivid picture of the extent of this impact, it is important to ask ourselves two awakening questions. Is it the observed economic growth just the GDP type, or is it the economic growth that involves a visible change in the livelihoods of a substantial portion of the population of a country? These two questions uncover the facile nature of the commonly reported impact of foreign aid. The media is awash with enticing figures that clearly show the lack of information on the core economic issue, the livelihoods. More still these two questions show that the impact of foreign aid on economic growth in Africa is torn between the ends of a see-saw, that is, highly raised on the side of GDP growth in a shameful co-existence with severely lowered dwindling livelihoods.
    These revelations have in them a hidden message we need to decipher. How can a report indicate a mega GDP rise and yet the mass livelihoods are not reflective of that growth? It is from such pang-filling information that I decipher that Africa’s economy is not Africa’s. In Uganda for example, the Exim bank of China is in pursuit of numerous investment arenas. They happen to be the ones largely funding the most expensive project on an express highway. This legacy investment has reportedly boosted Uganda’s economy by availing jobs for the people and market for some of the Ugandan construction products. The unseen bait in such an investment is the terms of the contract. They happen to trap the country’s economy in a lifetime of debt! This can, without hesitation, be likened to a “hijack of an economy”. Is Uganda’s economy still there? A record of similar hijacks has happened elsewhere and is still happening in Africa, thanks to foreign aid.
    Is foreign aid a necessary evil?
    Despite the fact that I’ve linked foreign aid to the hijacking of economies, it seems that its negative impact in that sense is not about to stop. Foreign aid is a modern joystick used to play a modern game called the African economy! It appears as though most African countries are so dependent on aid that without it almost half of their yearly budgetary commitments cannot be fulfilled. For example, in 1992, aid accounted for 12.4% of gross national product (GNP), over 70% of gross domestic savings and investments in Sub-Saharan Africa and over 50% of all imports.  Under the age-old saying that “you cannot bite the fingers that feed you,” leaders of these countries are unable to speak out when fake and unwanted goods flood their markets. It seems aid is not meant to ensure recipients become self-reliant since if it is the case, powerful states can no longer brag about who is giving more than the other. Does this mean that there’s no way out of this addiction? Well, thankfully, there’s a way out. The way out starts with the establishment of diligent, non-corrupt, non-bureaucratic institutions aimed at only scrutinizing the contracts that come with foreign aid so that we can avoid the pitfall of blindly trading off our economies. The institutions should employ the high value contract specialists of the continent to tackle any matter concerning incoming aid. It is a case of reversing the old adage that “a beggar is no chooser” to “a chooser is no beggar”. I believe if this reversal can be attained, foreign aid can be turned from the current path of negative impact to one of a mega positive boost to Africa’s economy. 
    Watch how Dambisa Moyo, a Zambian-born international economist and author of the book "Dead Aid: Why Aid is Not Working and How There is Another Way for Africa," respond to her critics, explaining the long-term impact that charitable HIV/AIDS programs will have on building sustainable economies in Africa.
  • (Header Image Credit: The Chinafrica Project)
  • Five Facts You Didn’t Know About African Economies

    Five Facts You Didn’t Know About African Economies

  •  Today some African countries like Kenya, Ethiopia and Rwanda are amongst the fastest growing economies in the world.
  • In spite of the high rate of unemployment, rising debts and dictatorship in most African countries, it has not deterred the arrival of positive change. Today some African countries like Kenya, Ethiopia and Rwanda are amongst the fastest growing economies in the world while others such as South Africa, Morocco and Egypt, are being ranked amongst the developed economies in Africa. Although African countries in fact still have a long way to go, it will be fallacious to say African economies are not emerging. With this regard we will bring you 5 things you did not know about African economies.

    1. Agriculture will depend on Africa in the future

    The availability of about 60% of the world’s unused land is in Africa which gives it the opportunity to develop its agriculture sector and reduce unemployment. According to an article by Susan Lund principal at the McKinsey Global Institute, current trends reveal that African agriculture is on course to create 8 million wage-paying jobs between now and 2020. She goes on to say Africa could add 6 million more jobs if policymakers could encourage expansion of large-scale commercial farming on to uncultivated land. For this to be however possible, African countries need to reform land rights, build up their infrastructure and improve access to inputs such as seeds, finance and insurance to boost agriculture. Such steps have allowed Mali, which built integrated road, rail and sea links to transport refrigerated goods and to increase its mango exports to the European Union six fold in just five years.

    Related: The 6 Fastest Growing Economies in Africa

    2. African workers are better educated than ever before

    Today 40 per cent of Africans have some secondary or tertiary education. By 2020, it will be nearly half. Trends however reveal that most Africans are not only educated in fields which would serve post independent Africa but, the era of complete independence. Today most African countries are host to car assembly plants like in South Africa and Nigeria, technology companies like Microsoft in Kenya all manned by Africans. Some African countries have been noted for training students who have come up with great initiatives in the fields of technology, science and business.

    3. Africa is booming

    Africa has been the second-fastest-growing region in the world over the past 10 years, with average annual growth of 5.1 per cent over the past decade, driven by greater political stability and economic reforms that have unleashed the private sector in many countries. While poverty is also on the retreat, Susan Lund reports that, since 2000, 31 million African households have joined the world's consuming class. At the point when household incomes exceed 5000 dollars measured at purchasing power parity. In her opinion Susan says the figure is projected to reach 128 million by 2020.

    4. Africa is poised to have the largest labour force in the world

    By 2035, Africa’s labour force will be bigger than that of any individual country in the world, which offers the continent a chance to reap from its young and growing workers to boost economic growth in various sectors especially technology which is one of the fastest growing sectors in Africa and the world. Countries like Rwanda and South Africa presently can be counted amongst the most technologically advanced in the world. This will also go a long way to increase the spending power and financial independence which in effect will lead to increase life expectancy and better standards of leaving.

    5. Reforms are on-going and will attract investors

    Following the release of the World Bank’s “Ease of Doing Business” report this year, more than 8 African countries were amongst the first 100 countries to do business in with a couple few hovering between 100 and 120. Most of these countries have reduced the procedures required for creating a business, facilitation the obtaining of power supply which is vital for businesses to run as well as reduction of time taken to import and export goods a clear example is Mauritius which ranked 49th in the world and first in Africa.
  • USA Created and Help Fund ISIS

    Leaked Pentagon Documents Show How USA Created and Help Fund ISIS

  • The United States is culpable and should take responsibility for the monster ISIS is.
  • When Donald Trump, the Republican Party’s candidate in the United States of America’s presidential race, alleged that President Barack Obama and the Democratic Party candidate, Hillary Clinton were the founders of ISIS, he drew much consternation from the public. It seemed like another of his trademark rants but the reality is, though it might not be Obama and Clinton as individuals who are to blame, the United States is culpable and should take responsibility for the monster ISIS is. ISIS is the creation of a reckless and unapologetically selfish US foreign policy. It is a global problem born of imperialist agendas. It is a United States foreign policy project gone wrong.

    The ISIS Problem

    In 1999, Abu Mus’ab al-Zarqawi, a Sunni extremist founded The Organisation of Monotheism and Jihad which became the Al Qa’ida in Iraq (AQI) in 2004 after he pledged allegiance to Osama Bin Laden. According to the National Counterterrorism Center of the USA, “The group targeted Coalition and Iraqi forces and civilians to pressure foreigners to leave Iraq, reduce popular support for the US and Iraqi Government, and attract recruits.”
    Zarqawi was killed in a 2006 airstrike and the group later became the Islamic State of Iraq, becoming the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham and then simply Islamic State in 2014. To put the effects of IS (as it is now known) into context, START conducted a study and revealed, “Between 2002 and 2015, more than 4,900 terrorist attacks were carried out by groups or organisations affiliated with the organisation now known as the Islamic State. These attacks caused more than 33,000 deaths and 41,000 injuries, and involved more than 11,000 individuals held hostage or kidnapped.” The attacks by ISIS are further said to have represented 13% of all terrorist attacks, 26% of all deaths, 28% of all injuries and 24% of all kidnap victims or hostages due to terrorism in the same period. With its social media savvy leadership, the group has managed to recruit more and more people resulting in more attacks in the most unlikely of places. No one is safe anymore.

    The USA Connection

    ISIS is one terrorist group which could have been history by now if the USA and her allies really intended to do away with it. In fact, it might have barely seen the light of day not for the confused policies of the US. A seven page leaked US intelligence report written in August 2012 put online by Judicial Watch proves the US knew of the harm its presence in the Middle East was making. Not only that, but the US was also aware of the potential of the then skirmishes between the Syrian Assad regime and rebels taking a “clear sectarian direction”. The United States was also aware that, “The Salafist, the Muslim Brotherhood and AQI (Al Qaeda In Iraq) are the major forces driving insurgency in Syria.” By now it is clear that AQI morphed into ISIS. However, the final revelation is even more telling.
    The document says, “The West, Gulf Countries and Turkey support the opposition, while Russia, China and Iran support the regime.” The opposition has already been established to be the AQI, and the Salafist and Muslim Brotherhood so in 2012, America and her friends were in support of AQI. To further prove the culpability of America, the report states in page 5, “If the situation unravels there is a possibility of establishing a declared or undeclared Salafist principality in Eastern Syria, and this is exactly what the supporting powers to the opposition want in order to isolate the Syrian regime, which is considered a strategic depth of the Shia expansion.”
    With a judgment clouded by the lingering possibility of overthrowing Bashar al-Assad, the USA and her allies chose to side with one of the deadliest terror groups to ever operate in the world. President Vladimir Putin in answering a question regarding ISIS from a US journalist at the Valdai International Discussion Club in 2014 asked important questions (rhetorical) that called for much United States introspection. He said, “Another threat President Obama mentioned was ISIS. Well, who on earth armed them? Who armed the Syrians that were fighting with Assad? Who created the necessary political and informational climate that facilitated this situation? Who pushed for the delivery of arms to the area?”
    There are no prizes for guessing the answer to President Putin’s questions. He further probed on the financing of IS arguing that most of the fighters in Syria were mercenaries funded by the US who defected for money to the IS. Where does IS get this money from? From the oil fields it has occupied in the region. The more important question is: Who is buying IS’s blood oil? Are the buyers really anonymous? Is the United States of America’s celebrated CIA unable to track who these buyers are? That is unlikely. The buyers are known and yet they are not under sanctions, the same sanctions which are a tool the United States is only too happy to use to prop up its imperialist ambitions.
    US Secretary of Defense, Ashton Carter gave a testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee in December where he tried to hide the USA’s knowledge of IS fuel trucks moving in Syria but was called out by Senator John McCain who said, “We all knew those trucks were moving back and forth. We’ve seen them. We knew it. The decision was not made by the White House to attack them.”
    The oil being a vital source of IS funding, why did the US sit on its hands and refrain from cutting this very important linkage that would destroy the allure of IS to mercenaries? It would seem the USA is deliberately sabotaging the global campaign to end IS to further its divide and conquer imperialist mind-set and to neutralise Russian power as if the Cold War is still on.
    President Barack Obama might not have the time to fix the many wrongs of his country’s foreign policy but whoever comes next has some real work to do. As far as the landscape of world politics is concerned, the USA is operating disturbingly like a big legitimised terror group and that is unacceptable. President Vladimir Putin gave good advice in the Valdai International Discussion Club when he said to the USA, “You must rise above the endless desire to dominate. You must stop acting out of imperialistic ambitions. Do not poison the consciousness of millions of people like there can be no other way but imperialistic politics.”
  • New Evidence: The Real Reason Gaddafi Was Killed

    New Evidence: The Real Reason Gaddafi Was Killed




  • Qaddafi was not killed for humanitarian purposes but for the oil and for money. His ideas of an African gold-backed currency were his major undoing.
  • The recent Hillary Clinton email leaks have opened a can of worms everywhere including in Africa. Wikileaks released an unclassified U.S. Department of State document emailed to Clinton, dated April 2, 2011. Sidney Blumenthal, the sender of the email confirmed what the world already suspected. Qaddafi was not killed for humanitarian purposes but for the oil and for money. His ideas of an African gold-backed currency were his major undoing.
    In April 2011, then President of the World Bank, Robert Bruce Zoellick spoke at a panel discussion about how he hoped the World Bank would have some sort of role in the reconstruction of Libya along with other countries.
    “Reconstruction now means (Ivory Coast), it now means Southern Sudan, it means Liberia, it means Sri Lanka, I hope it will mean Libya,” he said.
    To the ordinary person, this was the World Bank hoping to come in to help a failing state but to Economist John Perkins, the World Bank was not to be considered as fulfilling its supposed mandate. It was in actual fact a U.S. bank together with its sibling, the IMF. The United States controls about 16% of the World Bank while the second largest member, Japan has a paltry 7%. The United States again has around 17% voting rights in the International Monetary Fund. His point was that these institutions were and still are extensions of the Western foreign policy.
    “So, we might ask ourselves: What happens when a “rogue” country threatens to bring the banking system that benefits the corporatocracy to its knees?” he asked later saying the Western empire has a standing army (NATO) to violently protect its position.
    Libya was the “rogue” nation but the question is: Just what did Gaddafi have in mind?
    According to the IMF, Libya’s Central Bank is 100% state owned and in 2011, it was estimated to have 144 tons of gold in its vaults. Muammar Gaddafi’s plan was to introduce a gold-backed currency which he hoped African and Muslim nations would adopt. He felt it could rival the euro and the dollar, and rightly so too.
    Sidney Blumenthal, in his email to Hillary Clinton confirmed, “Qaddafi's government holds 143 tons of gold, and a similar amount in silver. During late March, 2011 these stocks were moved to SABHA (south west in the direction of the Libyan border with Niger and Chad); taken from the vaults of the Libyan Central Bank in Tripoli.”
    He went on to say the gold and silver was valued at $7 billion and was one of the reasons Nicolas Sarkozy embarked on a French attack of Libya.
    “Sarkozy's plans are driven by the following issues:

    a. A desire to gain a greater share of Libya oil production,

    b. Increase French influence in North Africa,

    c. Improve his internal political situation in France,

    d. Provide the French military with an opportunity to reassert its position in the world,

    e. Address the concern of his advisors over Qaddafi's long term plans to supplant France as the dominant power in, Francophone Africa,” wrote Blumenthal.

    If Qaddafi had succeeded, the United States of America and Europe would have been forced to buy oil and minerals in the gold backed currency thus tipping the scales. This was a horror the West dared not experience. The situation would have been a more lethal re-enactment of Saddam Hussein’s currency wars when he supported the new Euro currency at the expense of the United States Dollar. At this point, the U.S. was highly insecure about the effects of the new currency to its economy. Hussein’s decision to sell oil in the then new currency was a blow to the U.S. worsened by the proclamation that the dollar was the “currency of the enemy”. Currency wars have therefore been a fact of history with the Hussein situation being a peculiar intra-Western conflict that culminated in the Middle East instability promulgated by U.S. interventionist policies. That Qaddafi would be killed for planning to introduce an African currency to the fray is not surprising but that does not make it acceptable.
    The leaked Clinton email has far-reaching implications on the fluid state of post-colonial relations with the West. If anything, it is an eye-opener. Where Africa seeks to build an independent economic structure, the West is seen to try and derail those plans so as to retain its primacy in world affairs.
    With regard to the creation of a new currency, Ministry of Peace Founder, Dr James Thring said, “It’s one of those things that you have to plan almost in secret, because as soon as you say you’re going to change over from the dollar to something else, you’re going to be targeted.”
    And Qaddafi was targeted. He may not have been the most democratic leader in the world but Libyan citizens had arguably the best way of life in Africa. His plan of action (without the human rights violations) should be a blueprint for African development.